PDA

View Full Version : Commander Says Quality of Life Improving for Troops in Iraq



Grinder
24 October 2003, 09:44
By Linda D. Kozaryn
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, Oct. 24, 2003 - U.S. soldiers in Iraq are focused, dedicated and
committed to accomplishing their mission, U.S. Army Lt. Gen. Ricardo
Sanchez [http://www.vcorps.army.mil/www/CJTF7/leaders.htm] told reporters in Baghdad this week.

"They know what is expected of them," the commander of the coalition force said
at a news briefing Oct. 22.

Maintaining troop morale is a leadership responsibility, Sanchez said. Military
leaders must do the best they can with the resources allocated to ensure the
best quality of life possible is available to the soldiers.

"We have to be able to sustain the morale of our force, especially in this kind
of a tough environment," he said.

Soldiers are "expected to complain," the general added. "That's what soldiers
do, depending on their environments."

The quality of life levels for U.S. troops in Iraq are "drastically different,"
he said. "And all of that has an impact on what a soldier feels and what he
sees and what he does and what he says."

Overall, quality of life has improved tremendously, he said, and is far better
than what existed in the mid-summer time frame.

"When I look at what our soldiers are telling us," Sanchez said, "and I look at
our retention rates across the force that is deployed today, I think that's a
pretty darn good indicator of what our soldiers feel."

Of all the corps in the Army, he said, 5th Corps [http://www.vcorps.army.mil/www/default.htm] has the
highest re-enlistment rate. The 1st Armored
Division [http://www.1ad.army.mil/] was over 130 percent in its re-enlistment rate. The 101st Airborne Division [http://www.campbell.army.mil/division.htm]
was over 120 percent in its re-enlistment rates across the board. The 82nd Airborne Division [http://www.bragg.army.mil/www-82DV/] and 4th Infantry Division [http://www.hood.army.mil/4id/] had 120 and 140
percent retention, respectively.

"So when you talk about what are the soldiers feeling, what are they saying,
how are the conditions," the commander said, "all that has to be factored into
morale. In the end, it's about their dedication, it's about their understanding
that their leadership is taking care of them, and I think their leadership is
taking care of them. And so my statement to you on morale is that it's very
good and it will continue to be so."

Gambit
24 October 2003, 15:57
OK, I'll be the fall guy for what might be an obvious question... how can you have a re-enlistment rate greater than 100%? I can understand if new enlistments are included there (so you re-enlist everyone, and then add more)... but that's not really re-enlistment, right? I'm confused.

Sammy Sandbag
24 October 2003, 16:49
They're not saying everybody re-enlisting = 100% The Army places re-enlistment goals, therefore 110% would mean meeting the goal, plus 10%

Gambit
24 October 2003, 17:05
Ah, I see... perfectly sensible logic, once you uderstand the system. Interesting how the progress can be manipulated by setting goals appropriately... wonder what the flat numbers look like (i.e. re-enlistment trends, or stright up possible re-enlistments vs. actual).

Sammy Sandbag
24 October 2003, 18:18
You might be able to dig that up somewhere on army.mil. I'm sure it's available to the public, you probably just have to look hard.