PDA

View Full Version : Should the U.N. be dissolved?



Plastic Yank
26 October 2004, 10:07
I really think it's beyond all usefullness now. It may have served a purpose back in the '50s, but nowadays it's really just a mouthpeice for Planned Parenthood and those freaks in the Hague.

::TG Edit cuz TG da man::

::TG Edit again cuz TG a bad speller::

TheTokenGook
26 October 2004, 10:38
you mean dissolved?

Plastic Yank
26 October 2004, 13:23
Crap!!

Yes, I meant dissolved!! ARRRRRRRRRRRGGG!!!!

Plastic Yank
26 October 2004, 13:24
Could I get a mod to change the title?

Ezmartini
26 October 2004, 13:31
The UN is pretty worthless nowadays. The make resolutions, fail to enforce them, complain about Sudan, fail to do anything about it.

TheTokenGook
26 October 2004, 13:40
Could I get a mod to change the title?
Íê³É£¬Íê³ÉÏÈÉú»·ÈÆ×¢ÊÓ

and btw, it sounded like a poll, so I added one

Ezmartini
26 October 2004, 13:59
You spelled "dissolve" wrong

TheTokenGook
26 October 2004, 14:47
установленный распутник матери

*TG having way too much fun with free translation and talking in 3rd person*

natedogg42
26 October 2004, 15:55
The UN calls the genocide in Sudan "ethnic cleansing" because if they called it genocide, it would mean that they would have to do something about it (seriously, it was founded to basically stop the holocaust from happening to someone else...but they only have to act if it is G E N O C I D E...therefore, when they are called upon to stop with their useless talk and actually enforce anything, they just come up with another name for it and let hundreds of thousands of black Africans die at the hands of Arab Muslim militia....

OH but this organization is the model of a perfect government....can anyone say "Oil for Kickbacks?"

Punk
27 October 2004, 10:40
The UN calls the genocide in Sudan "ethnic cleansing" because if they called it genocide, it would mean that they would have to do something about it (seriously, it was founded to basically stop the holocaust from happening to someone else...but they only have to act if it is G E N O C I D E...therefore, when they are called upon to stop with their useless talk and actually enforce anything, they just come up with another name for it and let hundreds of thousands of black Africans die at the hands of Arab Muslim militia....

What they mean is that it’s only "ethnic cleansing" if it’s the Muslims killing Christians. Like they won't bother about Albanians killing Serbs and blowing 1,000 year old churches, but turn it around and suddenly it's a "Major humanitarian crisis".

TheTokenGook
27 October 2004, 10:51
UN sucks, fuck 'em

natedogg42
27 October 2004, 12:59
Who the fuck voted no?

Oh, and yeah...definetley should have given Slobadon a medal or at least left him alone for dealing with a terrorist insurgency in an effective manner...

If Billy Klinton didn't get caught with his pants down, he wouldn't have bombed the enemy of our enemy....

btw, FUCKING UN...

Punk
27 October 2004, 15:33
S***. Kofi Annan and his pals have their heads stuck so far up their ass's that they have to open their mouths to look around.

natedogg42
27 October 2004, 17:29
Now we have 3 pussies hiding...

"Countries don't have alliances, they have interests." - Kissinger

Plastic Yank
27 October 2004, 17:43
Now we have 3 pussies hiding...

Such a reaction betokens a lack of imagination. :lol:

Aries
27 October 2004, 18:47
Nate: I am shocked you didn't immediatly say "Dammit Aries why you voting like that"

seriously lacking imagination.

natedogg42
27 October 2004, 18:57
STFU Aries, why are you voting like that?

Plastic Yank
27 October 2004, 19:29
Such a reaction betokens a lack of imagination. :lol:

Sorry 'bout that Nate. I thought I was responding to something other than what I was responding to. :|

Aries
27 October 2004, 19:44
once again.. from the left:

ok. the UN needs to be there. but they need to step up their shit. I wish we wouldve had a mandate to go into Iraq, but the President saw it necessary to act without it. So we did, Saddam is out, and we are there. Now its time for the UN to take over and rebuild. its not our job to do this. We should be a strong part of it, but at the same time it should not just be us over there. there are times when the UN is good, times when its not. Times when the Rebublican/Democrat parties are good. times when they are not. tis life.

natedogg42
27 October 2004, 20:40
I could count the times the UN has proven useful on my fucking middle finger...

neo
28 October 2004, 09:04
I have to go with Aries on this one as a neo-liberalist in the realm of international relations.

Holt
28 October 2004, 09:06
the UN only works if every country with clout agrees to do something, and honestly, how often is that? It needs an overhall, but isnt due for the scrapheap

Gambit
28 October 2004, 10:11
My $0.02: more often than not, it's better to rebuild what you have than clear it out and start over. P/Rs, STFU, we didnt have anything in the first place. ;) But back on topic: like it or not, the UN is a huge collection of nations, and it would be harder to rebuild what it has than can it for what it doesn't have. Unfortunately, we need some drastic changes for it to become relevant again.

Punk
28 October 2004, 10:47
Well they need to stop acting like their own holier-then-thou independent group. They were formed by the U.S. (By the US!!!) after WW2, their based in New York, if they’re going to be so “No, you can’t do that” to the US then maybe they should be moved to France and the European Union they adore so much.

killernurse
28 October 2004, 14:05
Gee was that a crack on France? Better get on that, Gambit.

Punk
28 October 2004, 15:16
Gee was that a crack on France? Better get on that, Gambit.

I don't mean France in particular, just the general area of Europe.

natedogg42
28 October 2004, 18:16
The UN is run by corrupt officials.

The general assembly has no power.

The security council which technically does have power is only comprised of 15 nations with the 5 permanent ones (US, UK, China, France, Russia)...

The 5 nations have a permanent veto...that's wonderful. That's like having a country with 5 fucking presidents. We hardly get shit done with one, it gets infinetely harder with 5 to get anything done.

The US sits at the same level in the Security Council as does these 4 countries while the US spends over twice as much on their military (the world's police force) as the rest of the permanent members of the security council combined.

It wouldn't make sense to give Rhode Island 55 electoral votes just so that it could compete with California...if you see where I'm going.

The only way anything in the UN can get done is if the big 5 agree on EVERYTHING. Countries that are so completely different from one another will almost NEVER agree on everything because countries have INTERESTS to take care of not. As much as everyone would like to think the UN is some holy organization that tries to safeguard the world, it is just a collection of nations trying to do what is in each of their interests...

TheTokenGook
28 October 2004, 19:02
The US sits at the same level in the Security Council as does these 4 countries while the US spends over twice as much on their military (the world's police force) as the rest of the permanent members of the security council combined.
think we also provide 20% or so of the UN's budget

Gambit
28 October 2004, 20:23
Gee was that a crack on France? Better get on that, Gambit.

I don't mean France in particular, just the general area of Europe.

Why overreact, KN, when you can do it for me? Plus, he's so quick to fix himself, I'm really not worried... ;)

Punk
28 October 2004, 21:19
Ha! For all you know I could live in France.

TheTokenGook
28 October 2004, 21:28
nah, you probably live in Plastic Yank's closet or something

Gambit
28 October 2004, 21:28
Eh... you don't have enough of an accent. Besides, I'm TheTokenFrog around here, you can't one up me on that. ;)

killernurse
28 October 2004, 22:08
Why overreact, KN, when you can do it for me? Plus, he's so quick to fix himself, I'm really not worried... Me? I never overreact. ;) But he is a bit of a surrender monkey... maybe he is French after all. (with love, kn)

natedogg42
28 October 2004, 22:54
he is a bit of a surrender monkey... maybe he is French after all

I need a girl like that...I should have known that when I met my last girlfriend and one of the first things she said was "I want to work for the UN" and I said "I want to blow it up"...should have been an indicator of things to come...

Oh, and Gambit... RRRRRRRRRBIT

TheTokenGook
28 October 2004, 23:18
great pic :lol:
http://home.pacbell.net/skyzot/images/french_frog.jpg

TheTokenGook
28 October 2004, 23:19
alright, who voted that they were a dork?

Punk
29 October 2004, 13:35
WhyMe? I never overreact. ;) But he is a bit of a surrender monkey... maybe he is French after all. (with love, kn)

A WHAT?!?!!?! :evil: :evil: :evil: :x :evil: :evil: :evil: :x :x :x :x

Punk
29 October 2004, 13:50
Btw, only Canadians and Spaniards are surrender monkeys.

TheTokenGook
29 October 2004, 15:59
The French are the original surrender monkeys
Never heard anything about Canada and Spain

Punk
29 October 2004, 16:27
The French are the original surrender monkeys
Never heard anything about Canada and Spain

Remeber the train bombing in Spain last year?

I'll get to the others later.

neo
29 October 2004, 16:36
France still takes the cake on this one. God damn frogs.

Gambit
29 October 2004, 16:41
*bows*

Aries
29 October 2004, 16:53
so there was a brit at the game the other day.. i gave him some of my jack and coke.. we were bullshitting.. funny dude.. we disagreed on a few things about American policy and such, but he has his right to state whatever opinion he wants. i turned to him and said: "we can disagree on a lot of things, but the french still suck".

things were good after that.

neo
29 October 2004, 17:59
The hatred for the french... The ties that bind the anglo-saxon world

Gambit
29 October 2004, 18:22
Funny, the Brits loved me last week when I visited...

killernurse
29 October 2004, 20:00
babe, you're only half-frog remember? and did you make a point everywhere you went to say "Hi, I'm Gambit and I'm half French. Do you like me?" 'cus if so, I'm gonna laugh.

Gambit
29 October 2004, 20:27
Well, people did wonder how I got out of the airport so fast... gotta love the short lines at passport control for locals. ;)

TheTokenGook
2 November 2004, 20:03
"we can disagree on a lot of things, but the french still suck".

things were good after that.

ah yes, is there any country who wouldn't agree to that? Other than Iraq?